[asterisk-biz] Destop vs webbased
Zoa
zoachien at securax.org
Mon Jan 18 13:51:43 CST 2010
I don't think that the flashphone / java / active-x / npapi will take up
a lot of resources, it won't be more than their desktop equivalents. I
mean that the web browser will sometimes hang on flash banners (my
firefox doesnt like techcrunch for example) or opening of pdfs that
download too slowly
.
Google chrome might be different, not sure.
We have a webbased phone, (active-x and npapi is available at the
moment, flash and java will follow).
I prefer a webbased phone only in these cases:
- The user needs it occasionally to contact the company through the
website without having to configure a phone first.
- The user is working in a webbased environment, but does not do a lot
of regular websurfing. (most callcenter users have heavy restrictions on
what they can visit), a webbased phone that can be controlled through an
api makes the integration a lot easier.
Zoa
On 1/17/2010 9:45 PM, santosh chintalwar wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have developed the flash based web softphone which supports Audio as
> well as Video.
> I have tested the same with Mozilla Firefox 3.5.5 version browser.
> Guess what it never took more than 10% of CPU ( With audio and video ).
>
> Ruddy : Is that least CPU consumption ?
>
>
> Santosh Chintalwar
> +91 9949695124
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Ruddy Gbaguidi <plugworld at micnes.com
> <mailto:plugworld at micnes.com>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Zoa
>
> Yes, my biggest concern was about the performance of a webbased
> phone. When we consider that a browser take a lot of ressources it
> self and a
>
> Flash based audio can interfere this any other flash running like
> youtube and other websites.
>
> Also, the users can easily close their browser and their phone ...
>
> So, I guess for the moment, the classic desktop application is
> still the best.
>
> On zoiper, do you have any webbased version ?
>
> Thanks
>
> *From:* asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com
> <mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com>
> [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com
> <mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com>] *On Behalf Of *Zoa
> *Sent:* Friday 2010-01-15 8:36 AM
>
> *To:* asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com
> <mailto:asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [asterisk-biz] Destop vs webbased
>
>
> It all depends on the situation, i work for www.zoiper.com
> <http://www.zoiper.com>, we have or are working on all 3 scenario's.
> In general the overal audio quality of a desktop solution will be
> >> webbased (active-x/npapi/java) >> flash based.
>
> However, the ease of use (from an installation point of view) is
> the other way around.
>
> If the agents are using browser based software and they don't
> really surf to anything but their work, webbased will be fine.
> If they have acces to the complete web, including flash websites
> and javascript cpu intense websites, i would not recommend it.
>
> Zoa
>
> On 1/14/2010 6:42 PM, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> We are currently working on a softphone integrated with others
> features that could be use
>
> by anybody or agents in a call center.
>
> With all the flash web softphones like gizmocall coming out these
> days, I would like to know in an enterprise environment,
>
> what is the most suitable ? The classic desktop application that
> you can install and run or a web based phone that run on your
> browser ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20100118/f7e05838/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-biz
mailing list