[Asterisk-biz] bellster.net - GREAT advance
John A. Lestoni
john.lestoni at telesap.com
Mon Jan 24 15:29:46 MST 2005
Surely VOIP will lead to more regulation, but a SWAT commando kicking
my door because somebody used my phone line to make harrassing calls ...?
Hmmm, too much I think ... same thing can happen for terminating traffic for
another carrier if you are a VOIP shop ...
Bellster approach can be revolutionary, I think, no time for FUD.
Regards
John
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul" <digium-list at 9ux.com>
> To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion"
> <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 5:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] bellster.net - GREAT advance
>
>
> > The really good part is that when you sign up you agree not to eavesdrop
> > or record anything going through your node. It enhances the element of
> > surprise when the heavily-armed SWAT commandos assault you, your loved
> > ones and your premises. By now most law enforcement pros are well aware
> > that people in chat rooms can use hacked computers to mask identity and
> > location. They already know which snail mail addresses are actually mail
> > drops and forwarding services. I doubt that many of them are aware of
> > things like bellster. If anything it could lead to more regulation.
> > There are probably some good reasons why the caller ID display says
> > things like "pay telephone" or "correctional facility". I still remember
> > getting an automated announcement at my office when the collect call was
> > from the county jail. I promptly hung up and revoked all phone access
> > for a certain employee. I guess the next step is to require that relay
> > node operators be registered so the caller ID will say "could be from
> > any a_____e from anywhere on earth".
> >
> > Darren Nickerson wrote:
> >
> > > "skamp" <skamp at arkayinc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> uhmm im sure if you provide the asterisk logs you can show it
> > >> originated from someone elses IP.... come on now.... though maybe
> > >> problematic, note it can be proven.
> > >
> > >
> > > Okay, but ...
> > >
> > > Imagine local law enforcement calls you (because the complaint falls
> > > within their jurisdiction) about the harrassing phone calls you've
> > > been making. How long do you think it would take you to explain
> > > Asterisk to them, let alone dundi and bellster? How understanding of
> > > your predicament do you think they will be?
> > >
> > > -d
> > >
>
More information about the asterisk-biz
mailing list