[Dundi] Dundi w/ 1.0

[Greg Boehnlein]

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Mark Spencer wrote:

> Okay so to illustrate...
> 
> The core tier 1 people will all be exchanging *most* call setups.  The 
> challenge is to try to trim off as many branches as possible and to reduce 
> as much as possible the number of queries that have to go deep into the 
> tree.  To this end, it is beneficial to have numbers which are similar 
> (e.g. all Netherlands numbers) behind a one or more tier 1 / tier 2 nodes. 
> Note that the protocol is designed to handle *any* graph and any 
> distribution of numbers, but certain orientations are more effective in 
> the value they bring to the cache and in their ability to block off large 
> chunks of the tree.

Would it make sense then, to break the country into unique zones (I.E. 
East Coast, Midwest, Central, West Coast, South West, South East) or even 
by state and assign a unique Tier 1 in that zone to handle all the 
NPA/NXX's underneath? I suppose now would be a good time for me to read 
the white-paper and the RFC draft....

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST