[Asterisk-video] Question to H223MuxSDU::Pop()
Michael (qq12345)
qq12345 at web.de
Mon Feb 25 14:19:56 CST 2008
Hi,
in that case, I prefer using
#include <assert.h>
assert( false );
or
assert( ini > end ) ;
Nevertheless I try to file a bug.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-video-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-video-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
> Sergio Garcia Murillo
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:21 PM
> To: Development discussion of video media support in Asterisk
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-video] Question to H223MuxSDU::Pop()
>
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:07 +0100, Michael (qq12345) wrote:
> > Hi Sergio,
> >
> > in the method below, the construct with the 0-Pointer, I have never
> > seen and it looks strange for me.
> > Is that intended? Would you like to shed some light on this?
> >
> > BYTE H223MuxSDU::Pop()
> > {
> > if(ini>=end)
> > *((BYTE*)0)=0;
> > //Exit
> > return buffer[ini++];
> > }
> >
>
> Do you know a fastest way to get a core dump?? ;)
> Should be an assertion check that I put in a paranoid day just to make
> sure I was not getting memmory overwritten. As the condition is never
> meet it would never cause a problem. I'll remove it anyway.
>
> Could you put it on the tracker just to make sure I don't
> fotget to fix
> it?
>
> Best regards and thank you
> Sergio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-video mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-video
>
More information about the asterisk-video
mailing list