[asterisk-users] asterisk-users Digest, Vol 160, Issue 5
sam habash
sam_habash at hotmail.com
Mon Nov 20 14:16:52 CST 2017
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com> on behalf of asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com <asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 6:00:01 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 160, Issue 5
Send asterisk-users mailing list submissions to
asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
asterisk-users-request at lists.digium.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
asterisk-users-owner at lists.digium.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of asterisk-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. ? PJSIP and Non Media Proxy (Saint Michael)
2. Re: ? PJSIP and Non Media Proxy (Joshua Colp)
3. Re: ? PJSIP and Non Media Proxy (Pete Mundy)
4. PJSIP console messages with Zoiper (Brian Capouch)
5. Re: PJSIP console messages with Zoiper (Richard Mudgett)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 13:42:50 -0500
From: Saint Michael <venefax at gmail.com>
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: [asterisk-users] ? PJSIP and Non Media Proxy
Message-ID:
<CAC9cSODhimCys4k-HRiBqXt++p7nUsj=yV-bJcbxwrz6NjrOxA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
?Now that Joshua had the kindness to respond, I see here a big disconnect
between Digium and the VOIP industry. 99% of the VOIP entrepreneurs like me
would need to avoid proxying the media. Would would Digium support and
bring in with such fanfare a channel like PJSIP that lacks the only thing
that 99% would need to do business in an efficient manner? I mean people
like me buy and sale billion of minutes every day, and most of my peers
gravitate towards Opensips and other solution that do not touch the media.
Yesterday I had to roll back my sleeves and go back to the old sip channel.
I would love to see Asterisk-PJSIP to find a way to act like a proxy. This
would turn Asterisk into a real wholesale business tool, which is not, so
far.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: < http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171105/bb20497f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 15:16:09 -0400
From: Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ? PJSIP and Non Media Proxy
Message-ID:
<1509909369.1519452.1162348936.4EB33815 at webmail.messagingengine.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017, at 02:42 PM, Saint Michael wrote:
> ?Now that Joshua had the kindness to respond, I see here a big disconnect
> between Digium and the VOIP industry. 99% of the VOIP entrepreneurs like
> me
> would need to avoid proxying the media. Would would Digium support and
> bring in with such fanfare a channel like PJSIP that lacks the only thing
> that 99% would need to do business in an efficient manner? I mean people
> like me buy and sale billion of minutes every day, and most of my peers
> gravitate towards Opensips and other solution that do not touch the
> media.
> Yesterday I had to roll back my sleeves and go back to the old sip
> channel.
> I would love to see Asterisk-PJSIP to find a way to act like a proxy.
> This
> would turn Asterisk into a real wholesale business tool, which is not, so
> far.
It's not the lack of this feature which drives people to using OpenSIPS
or Kamailio for this use case. It's just fundamentally designed
differently and better performant for that scenario. Asterisk isn't the
best solution for everything everyone needs or wants, and that's okay.
There are other projects (like those already mentioned) that are a
better fit, and Asterisk can even play a part in there as an application
server.
I'm a firm believer in using the right tool for the right job even if it
means that Asterisk isn't the right fit. Frustrated users are something
I never want to see.
--
Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: www.digium.com<http://www.digium.com> & www.asterisk.org<http://www.asterisk.org>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 08:37:30 +1300
From: Pete Mundy <pete at fiberphone.co.nz>
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] ? PJSIP and Non Media Proxy
Message-ID: <958B7A39-4B14-4C08-A508-6C7DD3CD5C6F at fiberphone.co.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> On 6/11/2017, at 7:42 AM, Saint Michael <venefax at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip> I see here a big disconnect between Digium and the VOIP industry. 99% of the VOIP entrepreneurs like me would need to avoid proxying the media. </snip>
Wow, that's quite a bold statement. I must be one of the 1% then because I'm a VoIP entrepreneur and I've had no need to do such thing.
> <snip> I mean people like me buy and sale billion of minutes every day" </snip>
Granted, I don't "buy and sell billions of minutes every day"... By my calcs that would require some 11K+ channels running 24X7, and that's just for one billion per day! So I'm dubious of the claim, and that in turn makes me dubious of the quoted 99% figure too.
Pete
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: < http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171106/9ff54fd4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: < http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171106/9ff54fd4/attachment-0001.pgp>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 23:11:15 -0500
From: Brian Capouch <brianc at palaver.net>
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] PJSIP console messages with Zoiper
Message-ID:
<CAPnJj3UTNpnnL5vrJkS8zuzAJt56OceJj0F9fdmMTd4a+CgWfg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
I'm running Asterisk 15.1.0 and in the process of converting my
various SIP endpoints to use PJSIP.
My Zoiper client causes the messages quoted below to show up on the
CLI once per minute. Things seem to work OK, but I am curious because
there seems to be no way to suppress the messages, and there are three
per minute, clogging up the console.
Thanks.
b.
** snip **
-- Added contact
'sip:8005 at 64.184.17.216:51891;rinstance=21e198ab7d94a096' to AOR
'8005' with expiration of 60 seconds
== Contact 8005/sip:8005 at 64.184.17.216:51891;rinstance=21e198ab7d94a096
has been deleted
== Contact 8005/sip:8005 at 64.184.17.216:51891;rinstance=21e198ab7d94a096
has been created
-- Contact 8005/sip:8005 at 64.184.17.216:51891;rinstance=21e198ab7d94a096
is now Unknown. RTT: 0.000 msec
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:50:47 -0600
From: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PJSIP console messages with Zoiper
Message-ID:
<CALD46g2prBKEmSRceFCnzQ0BhTZXv4QKQ4j_9oGK8YLZnbSAHg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Brian Capouch <brianc at palaver.net> wrote:
> I'm running Asterisk 15.1.0 and in the process of converting my
> various SIP endpoints to use PJSIP.
>
> My Zoiper client causes the messages quoted below to show up on the
> CLI once per minute. Things seem to work OK, but I am curious because
> there seems to be no way to suppress the messages, and there are three
> per minute, clogging up the console.
>
Your console has the verbose level set to 3 or higher so you have asked to
see them. Setting the verbose level to 1 will suppress them on the console.
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: < http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171106/fb5c070a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
Check out the new Asterisk community forum at: https://community.asterisk.org/
New to Asterisk? Start here:
https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Getting+Started
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
End of asterisk-users Digest, Vol 160, Issue 5
**********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20171120/2c85ab74/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list