[asterisk-users] Strange and complete failure of Asterisk 1.8

Markus Weiler markus_weiler at mailworks.org
Wed May 27 13:27:58 CDT 2015


definitely DNS...
check your Register lines...


Markus



Am 27.05.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Duncan Turnbull:
> DNS failure could do this
>
> Asterisk used to get stuck in a symmetric DNS request wait state which meant everything ground to a halt as it waited for a reply while DNS timed out.
>
> The recommended option was either ip only or a DNS proxy that failed fast this letting asterisk continue
>
> Cheers Duncan
>
>
>
>> On 27/05/2015, at 11:55 pm, Stefan Viljoen <viljoens at verishare.co.za> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> We've had a very strange failure on an Asterisk 1.8 install that has been
>> running for about a year at a customer site.
>>
>> The physical hardware is fine, all other services off the Centos 6.5 server
>> are running. Only Asterisk is not working...
>>
>> The first symptom was that no calls can be made over the SIP phones used
>> with it, and no calls could be received over the SIP trunk connected to it.
>>
>> I checked and noted that
>>
>> sip show peers
>>
>> in the CLI would either do nothing (e. g. just show asterisk*cli> again,
>> with no response) or it would return only this:
>>
>> asterisk*CLI> sip show peers
>> Name/username              Host                                    Dyn
>> Forcerport ACL Port     Status
>> asterisk*CLI>
>>
>> A module show like sip also does literally nothing, just
>>
>> asterisk*cli> module show like sip
>> asterisk*CLI>
>>
>> Soon after this, I lost the capacity to get any response if I do an asterisk
>> -r on the commandline - it would just hang indefintely.
>>
>> Did a reboot, and then, I couldnt start asterisk at all - entering
>>
>> # asterisk
>>
>> would also just hang.
>>
>> So, I recompiled asterisk from source and reinstalled the executable and all
>> the module files. Still the same.
>>
>> I happened to have an older asterisk executable from a few months before
>> laying around and sha256summed it - and there was a difference in the
>> checksum vs. the non-working asterisk binary - BUT it turned out that the
>> newly recompiled asterisk binary has the SAME SHA256 checksum as the
>> non-working asterisk binary.
>>
>> System seems fine otherwise, nothing relevant in /var/log/messages or dmesg
>> indicating a hardware failure. /var/log/asterisk/messages also contains no
>> strange warnings or errors.
>>
>> Anybody got any idea why I cannot resuscitate my Asterisk install, even
>> after recompiling it from scratch from source? Why would asterisk die like
>> this in the first place?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>                http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list