[asterisk-users] RHEL6 packages - SRTP support? [patch]

[Daniel Pocock]

On 03/06/13 23:04, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 03/06/13 19:18, Jason Parker wrote:
>>
>> On 06/03/2013 12:03 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>> I tried building manually from the source RPM
>>>
>>> Before running rpmbuild, I installed libsrtp-devel and I notice that
>>> res_srtp.so is generated during the build
>>>
>>> However, the rpmbuild fails for other reasons (see the other email I
>>> sent to the list about mISDNutils-devel and other spec file errors)
>>>
>>> Can you confirm the exact procedure you recommend for rpmbuild on a
>>> CentOS6 system
>> rpmbuild --rebuild --without tds --without misdn somepackage.src.rpm
>>
> Now trying it on a fresh VM (CentOS 6 + EPEL6, freshly built)
>
> I have these errors during installation of build dependencies:
>
>
>   Installing : kmod-dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032-2.6.2-1_centos6.2.6.32
>   20/73
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64/weak-updates/dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.ko
> needs unknown symbol vpmadtreg_unregister
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64/weak-updates/dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.ko
> needs unknown symbol vpmadtreg_register
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64/weak-updates/dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.ko
> needs unknown symbol vpmadtreg_unregister
> WARNING:
> /lib/modules/2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64/weak-updates/dahdi-linux-fwload-vpmadt032/dahdi_vpmadt032_loader.ko
> needs unknown symbol vpmadtreg_register
>
>
>
> and then rpmbuild fails with:
>
> checking for gcc... no
> checking for cc... no
> configure: error: in `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/asterisk-11.4.0':
> configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH
> See `config.log' for more details
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.isB97h (%build)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
>     Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.isB97h (%build)
>
>
>
> so I think to be added to the build dependencies in the spec file.
>
>
> Then there is a more cryptic failure:
>
> checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /lib/cpp
> configure: error: in `/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/asterisk-11.4.0':
> configure: error: C++ preprocessor "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
> See `config.log' for more details
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.q7wr5n (%build)
>
>
>
> config.log reveals that g++ is missing.  The build dependency is gcc-c++
> -  I install that and it fails due to missing make
>
> Later, there is another failure due to missing subversion.
>
> Altogether, these are the missing lines for the spec file:
>
> BuildRequires: gcc
> BuildRequires: gcc-c++
> BuildRequires: make
> BuildRequires: subversion
>
>
> although I would recommend not having a build dependency on SVN or
> network access, some people like to build on secured machines without
> network access.
>
>
> Eventually, I end up with the same failure I had before:
>
>
> RPM build errors:
>     File not found:
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64/usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/cdr_adaptive_odbc.so
>     File not found:
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64/usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/cdr_odbc.so
>     File not found:
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64/usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/cel_odbc.so
>     File not found:
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64/usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/func_odbc.so
>     File not found:
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64/usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/res_config_odbc.so
>     File not found:
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64/usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/res_odbc.so
>
>
>
> Now I've tried:
>
>
> rpmbuild --rebuild \
>     --without tds \
>     --without misdn \
>     --without odbc \
>     asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.src.rpm
>
> and on the rebuild, I get
>
> gzip: ./usr/share/man/man8/autosupport.8 already exists; do you wish to
> overwrite (y or n)?
> gzip: ./usr/share/man/man8/astgenkey.8 already exists; do you wish to
> overwrite (y or n)?
>
> which suggests that `make clean' didn't really clean up after the last
> attempt
>
> Finally, I get:
>
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/asterisk-11.4.0-1_centos6.x86_64
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/func_speex.so
>    /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/res_srtp.so
>
>
> RPM build errors:
>     Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/func_speex.so
>    /usr/lib64/asterisk/modules/res_srtp.so
>
>
> so I added those two items to the spec file and finally I have a build.
>
> I attach a diff for fixing the spec file, it fixes all these issues
> except the `make clean'


Now I tried to repeat the build on the original CentOS6 box using the
spec file that I patched on the fresh VM

The build failed again on the original box, complaining about unpackaged
files

I removed the following -devel packages from the box:

rpm -e mISDN-devel radiusclient-ng-devel openldap-devel spandsp-devel
freetds-devel

and then I was able to run the build successfully.

So it appears that the build is sensitive to the presence of additional
devel packages that are not build requirements in the spec.