[asterisk-users] Asterisk and sites connected via IP-VPN

Vladimir Mikhelson vlad at mikhelson.com
Wed Dec 4 12:30:15 CST 2013

IPSec VPN is what we use.  The biggest issue is QoS.

I do not see any other inexpensive solution.


On 12/4/2013 12:10 PM, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote:
> Have seen mostly a lot of hq/branch implementations using IPSEC over
> standard Internet connections.. that's what seems most cost effective
> for most smb's, imo, with the inherent trade-offs. Other than that,
> I'd say private IP VPN's based on HDSL E1's. 
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, er ic <email.eherr9633 at gmail.com
> <mailto:email.eherr9633 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     Just wanted to get a feel for people in the community.
>     I researched a lot of information but I wanted to know the
>     communities perspective on this and didnt want to revive a dead
>     thread:
>     Any pros/cons for connection to asterisk boxes located at
>     different sites via an IP-VPN or Frame Relay?
>     I wanted to know the best cost effective way to connect the two
>     remote boxes other than the Internet.
>     Thanks in advanced!
>     -E
>     --
>     _____________________________________________________________________
>     -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>     New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>                    http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>     asterisk-users mailing list
>     To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>        http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131204/a99d5767/attachment.html>

More information about the asterisk-users mailing list