[asterisk-users] [webrtc] Received SAVPF profle in audio offer but AVPF is not enabled

Daniel Pocock daniel at pocock.com.au
Mon Apr 1 16:57:34 CDT 2013



On 01/04/13 22:06, Joshua Colp wrote:
> Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> Thanks for the fast reply.  I agree backporting full support for AVPF
>> would not be justified for many use cases (including my own).  What I
>> was more curious about is whether the F can be tolerated (in other
>> words, ignored or silently removed), as described here:
> 
> From a code perspective, it could. Still not something I would be
> comfortable with putting in Asterisk 1.8.
> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg01145.html
>> "1) RTCWEB end-point will always signal AVPF or SAVPF. I signalling
>> gateway to legacy will change that by removing the F to AVP or SAVP."
>>
>> and whether such behavior is possible even without setting avpf=yes on a
>> per-peer basis?
> 
> This is fine for incoming but what about outgoing to a device?
> 

Excellent question... I've seen one of my Polycom devices reboot itself
each time it receives a raw SDP from WebRTC, so if such a hack is
implemented, I'd guess that stripping the F is better than ignoring it.




More information about the asterisk-users mailing list