[asterisk-users] [webrtc] Received SAVPF profle in audio offer but AVPF is not enabled

Joshua Colp jcolp at digium.com
Mon Apr 1 15:06:27 CDT 2013

Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Thanks for the fast reply.  I agree backporting full support for AVPF
> would not be justified for many use cases (including my own).  What I
> was more curious about is whether the F can be tolerated (in other
> words, ignored or silently removed), as described here:

 From a code perspective, it could. Still not something I would be 
comfortable with putting in Asterisk 1.8.

> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg01145.html
> "1) RTCWEB end-point will always signal AVPF or SAVPF. I signalling
> gateway to legacy will change that by removing the F to AVP or SAVP."
> and whether such behavior is possible even without setting avpf=yes on a
> per-peer basis?

This is fine for incoming but what about outgoing to a device?

Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:  www.digium.com  & www.asterisk.org

More information about the asterisk-users mailing list