[asterisk-users] (last call for comments) Proposed changes to Asterisk release and support cycles

[Administrator TOOTAI]

Le 08/02/2012 23:28, Kevin P. Fleming a écrit :
> On 02/08/2012 04:02 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
>> Not a complaint, per se, just a question.  Why are the LTS versions 
>> "odd"
>> (11, 13, 15, etc) and the non-LTS (10, 12, etc) even?   As I read the 
>> chart,
>> Digium/Asterisk is committing to a new LTS version every 2 years?
>
> Well, the first LTS was Asterisk 1.4 (although we didn't call it an 
> LTS then). The second LTS was Asterisk 1.8. The third would be 
> Asterisk 11. It's just a quirk of the version numbering scheme.
>
> The proposal is that yes, we'd be committing to producing an LTS every 
> 2 years, and a standard release in the intervening years.
>

I agree with Danny. To get thinks back to odd, why not skip the Asterisk 
11 version and go straight to 12 for next LTS? Such behavior was already 
done by going from 1.8 to 10, so one more ... ;-)

-- 
Daniel