[asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch

[Zohair Raza]

It's 4 core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU    X3220 with 6GB RAM

Regards,
Zohair Raza


On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Bryant Zimmerman <BryantZ at zktech.com> wrote:

> Zohair
>
> What kind of hardware spec are you running CPU, MEM, Drives?
>
> Thanks
>
> Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)
> 616-855-1030 Ext. 2003
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Zohair Raza" <engineerzuhairraza at gmail.com>
> *Sent*: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:08 AM
> *To*: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <
> asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> *Subject*: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch
>
> Virendra,
>
>  You can test your box with sipp
>
>
> http://etel.wiki.oreilly.com/wiki/index.php/Using_SIPp_to_Stress_Test_Asterisk
>
>
>  I have verified my Asterisk 1.8 box handling 500 concurrent calls and 15
> calls per seconds with 20% cpu, without transcoding.
>
>  Regards,
> Zohair Raza
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Brynjolfur Thorvardsson <binni at itanet.nu>wrote:
>
>>  My Asterisk 1.4.19 happily excepts up to 80 concurrent calls (the most
>> I’ve seen so far) which sends the CPU load up to ~20% on a fairly old
>> server. In our busiest period, from 8 to 8:05 I see up to 200 incoming
>> calls, somewhat less than one call/second.
>>
>>
>>
>> My superiors want to expand and increase the number of clients
>> significantly and the scalability of Asterisk is beginning to worry me.
>> Someone mentioned a “roof” of 250 CC in Asterisk after which stability and
>> call quality becomes increasingly affected.
>>
>>
>>
>> My plan is to implement load-balancing using DUNDi with one extra server
>> initially, and a second available on site for further expansion. This
>> should enable me to accommodate ten times our current load without any
>> significant problems (I hope!), and adding more servers is fairly easy
>> (although I guess there are diminishing returns?).
>>
>>
>>
>> When it comes to the long term I must admit I am increasingly looking at
>> trying out FreeSwitch, the configuration might be trickier but scalability
>> is much higher on my list of priorities.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Fra:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
>> asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *På vegne af *virendra bhati
>> *Sendt:* 7. februar 2012 12:38
>>
>> *Til:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>>  *Emne:* [asterisk-users] Asterisk V/s FreeSwitch
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Why FreeSwitch can handle more then 1,000CC and asterisk only 25CC ? What
>> technology FreeSwitch is used and asterisk don't. I don't know it's the
>> right or wrong but this question come to my mind...
>>
>> --
>>
>>  Thanks and regards
>>
>>  Virendra Bhati
>> +91-8885268942
>> Software Engineer
>> E-mail-: virbhati at gmail.com
>> Skype id:- virbhati2
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
>               http://www.asterisk.org/hello
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120208/c4356796/attachment.htm>