No subject

emoving them from our dialplans as time allows for testing. <br />
<br />
<div id=3D"divSignature">Thanks<br />
<br />
Bryant&nbsp;Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)<br />
616-855-1030 Ext. 2003</div>
<br />
<br />
<span style=3D"font-family: tahoma,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><hr =
align=3D"center" size=3D"2" width=3D"100%" />
<b>From</b>: "Jonas Kellens" &lt;jonas.kellens at telenet.be&gt;<br />
<b>Sent</b>: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:53 AM<br />
<b>To</b>: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" &lt;as=
terisk-users at lists.digium.com&gt;<br />
<b>Subject</b>: [asterisk-users] Macro vs sub</span><br />
<br />
<span style=3D"font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;">Hello list,<br /=
>
<br />
can I conclude that it is better to use sub's in stead of macro's ?<br />
<br />
I read the following in an Asterisk-book :<br />
<br />
GoSub() works in a different manner from Macro(), though, in that it doesn&=
rsquo;t have the stack space requirements, so<br />
it nests effectively. Essentially, GoSub() acts like Goto() with a memory o=
f where it came from.<br />
<br />
Is it then not better to use a method that does not stack ?!<br />
<br />
<br />
Kind regards,<br />
<br />
Jonas.<br />
</span><br /></span>

------=_NextPart_000_0001_597A3D6D.3483A974--