[asterisk-users] Core show translation > 4000ms

[Administrator TOOTAI]

Le 30/09/2011 17:02, Jason Parker a écrit :
> On 09/30/2011 09:53 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>> In article<4E85D19F.4090602 at digium.com>,
>> Kevin P. Fleming<kpfleming at digium.com>  wrote:
>>> This is why the output was changed to microseconds from milliseconds; in
>>> the older version, the lowest number that should be shown was 1
>>> millisecond, even if the actual amount of time consumed was 10
>>> microseconds (or less). The "1" numbers in the output from the older
>>> could easily have been "0.02", which would be closer to the output from
>>> the new version.
>> Maybe, but that still doesn't explain why there is a factor of 2000
>> between some conversions and others. And 4001, 4002 and 4003 are
>> remarkably like a big round number plus a tiny offset! I would agree
>> with the OP that the values shown look suspicious and would bear
>> some investigating...
>>
> I believe the way it gets calculated was also changed a bit.
>
> You'll commonly see numbers that are near multiples of 1000.  If I'm not
> mistaken these are the duration of a context switch (or several context
> switches), which means that with this output, you can guess that his kernel is
> probably compiled with CONFIG_HZ_250.

As Tony pointed out, it's the factor between both translation directions 
which push me to ask. I can leave with microseconds and understand the 
why, but values should not have a so big interval.

-- 
Daniel