[asterisk-users] MagicJack quality

[jon pounder]

On 05/24/2011 11:57 AM, A J Stiles wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2011, jon pounder wrote:
>> On 05/24/2011 11:35 AM, A J Stiles wrote:
>>
>>
>> Someone asked about the quality of it, he was quoting the hardware specs
>> of a similar device.
> No they didn't.  The "original message" to which the spammer was pretending to
> reply  (and in the wrong place, even)  never existed in the first place.
>
>> I doubt magicjack publishes that kind of detail about theirs.
>>
>> so where is the problem ? Its irrelevant he represents that device
>> commercially.
> The problem is that it is a blatant advertisement, not-very-cunningly
> disguised as a legitimate response to a question.  This is known as tag-team
> spamming  (or at least, it is when someone actually pretends to post a
> question).
>

At least its a related product, not porn or pills.