[asterisk-users] Sangoma A108 PCIe V2.0

[Nyamul Hassan]

Thank you for your info Moises.  For those who want to have a high density
system, can you provide what modifications to the Dahdi (or anything else)
do you make?

Regards
HASSAN


On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:39, Moises Silva <moises.silva at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Nyamul Hassan <mnhassan at usa.net> wrote:
>
>> While this is too many "eggs" in one basket, but can be useful if you have
>> "too many" E(T)1s say equivalent to a STM1 (OC3) or more.  In that case, it
>> would be too many boxes at 8ports / box.
>>
>>  Somewhere in the mailing list, Sangoma devs said that they do 32E(T)1
>> per box on the labs quite frequently, although mostly for load testing.
>>
>>
> That is correct, that is our typical load test scenario. However, Asterisk
> is a complex system with many features. Our testing focus on SIP to TDM
> bridging, meaning the only used applications are Answer() and Dial() with
> the DAHDI and SIP channel drivers, typically with latest 1.4.
>
> Additionally we always compile DAHDI modifying the chunk size to reduce the
> interrupt load.
>
> As far as your question about PCIe 2.0, yes the A108 should work just fine
> there.
>
> Moises Silva
> Senior Software Engineer
> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | NEW 100 Renfrew Drive, Suite 100, Markham ON
> L3R 9R6 Canada
> t. 1 905 474 1990 x128 | e. moy at sangoma.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100918/56d2fbdd/attachment.htm