[asterisk-users] Difference

[Zeeshan Zakaria]

For a production environment, 1.4 is the most stable, and it has everything
one needs to setup a telecom platform. As per my understanding 1.6 never got
the same recognition for stability as 1.4, plus it doesn't have any
significant advantages over 1.4. The newer version 1.8 series might be my
next jump once it'll be out of beta, but at this time it should not be used
in a production environment. Many of us still use 1.4 in production and if
you are just starting, this'll be your best choice.

Zeeshan A Zakaria

--
www.ilovetovoip.com

On 2010-10-06 11:54 AM, "Danny Nicholas" <danny at debsinc.com> wrote:

 From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Be...

*From:* asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Rizwan Hisham
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:44 AM


To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Difference





Is there any major architectural difference between 1.4 and 1.8?

The dialplan uses the 1.6 nomenclature (delimiter in dialplan changes from ,
to |) and the AGI structure is enhanced.  If you don’t use AGI’s, a
qualified “not really”.

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
              http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20101006/b9a47e99/attachment.htm