[asterisk-users] Getting: Can't fix up channel from 5 to 7 because 7 is already in use, and pri_dchannel: Answer requested on channel 0/7 not in use on span 1

Håkon Nessjøen haakon at avelia.no
Thu Mar 4 03:08:48 CST 2010


Sometimes I get these in my kernel log:

[3763662.549761] __sdla_bus_read_4:888: wanpipe PCI Error: Illegal Register
read: 0x0040 = 0xFFFFFFFF
[4014422.079673] __sdla_bus_read_4:888: wanpipe PCI Error: Illegal Register
read: 0x0040 = 0xFFFFFFFF

Anyone who knows what this is about?

2010/2/25 Håkon Nessjøen <haakon at avelia.no>

> System have been working great for weeks, using an average 40 of 120
> dahdi channels.
>
> But today, I suddenly see scary things like this:
>
>    -- Moving call from channel 5 to channel 7
> [Feb 25 10:18:12] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:10608
> pri_fixup_principle: Can't fix up channel from 5 to 7 because 7 is
> already in use
> [Feb 25 10:18:12] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:11535 pri_dchannel:
> Ringing requested on channel 0/7 not in use on span 1
>    -- Moving call from channel 7 to channel 12
> [Feb 25 10:18:12] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:10608
> pri_fixup_principle: Can't fix up channel from 7 to 12 because 12 is
> already in use
> [Feb 25 10:18:12] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:11535 pri_dchannel:
> Ringing requested on channel 0/12 not in use on span 1
>    -- DAHDI/4-1 is ringing
> [Feb 25 10:18:17] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:10608
> pri_fixup_principle: Can't fix up channel from 5 to 7 because 7 is
> already in use
> [Feb 25 10:18:17] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:11680 pri_dchannel:
> Answer requested on channel 0/7 not in use on span 1
> [Feb 25 10:18:22] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:10624
> pri_fixup_principle: Whoa, there's no  owner, and we're having to fix
> up channel 5 to channel 7
>
> [Feb 25 10:21:44] WARNING[17129]: chan_dahdi.c:10661
> pri_fixup_principle: Call specified, but not found?
>
> What would be the reason for things like this to happen?
>
> And are they really just warnings (as it says), or actual errors,
> where something bad is happening to the actual calls, or calls not
> acknowledged?
>
> Håkon
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20100304/0dbdf23d/attachment.htm 


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list