[asterisk-users] Virtual machine timing (KVM)
Bruce Komito
brucek at wpti.net
Wed Feb 24 11:05:48 CST 2010
FWIW, we recently moved a 1.4.29 Asterisk system onto a VMWare guest machine and with 40+ call legs (20+ calls), it isn't even breaking a sweat. We have had no complaints from users nor have we noticed any degradation in voice quality, be it live, voicemail or conference bridge (with six participants). The underlying hardware is an HP ProLiant DL360 G5 (Xeon 5160 3gz, 2 cores) with 20gb of memory and the VMWare version is ESXi 4.
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Sean Brady
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:37 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Virtual machine timing (KVM)
> To get MeetMe working properly, I know some sort of timing device
> provided by the zaptel package is required (even if it means the
> zt_dummy). But, on a virtual machine I know that the Linux timing won't
> work as expected. Is it possible to then dedicate a physical device
> like a USB port or something to the virtual machine to use for the
> timing interrupts?
The 2.2.1 version of DAHDI using DAHDI dummy seems to be working adequately in a Xen environment on CentOS for me, although I haven't been using MeetMe. Have you run into issues with it specifically? Which version of DAHDI are you using? If there are some issues that you have found I would like to know...
Thanks,
Sean
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list