[asterisk-users] Intel Vs AMD

David fire ddfire at gmail.com
Sun Feb 22 19:32:43 CST 2009


2009/2/22 Gordon Henderson
<gordon+asterisk at drogon.net<gordon%2Basterisk at drogon.net>
>

> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, michel freiha wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I took my decision to use Asterisk server for handling my VOIP calls...My
> > next step is to choose the best hardware that I should use i order to
> have
> > the best performance...Here I faced 2 choices for my hardware (CPU)...
> > 1- Using Intel CPU or AMD
> > 2- Use 32 or 64 bits
> >
> > Can you help me please to choose between the above choices and what is
> the
> > advantage and disadvantage of each of choices
>
> How many concurrent calls. How much transcoding?
>
> A 1GHz Via processor with 128KB cache will handle 100 concurrent calls
> with no transcoding. Anything above that is a bonus, and 64-bit is a waste
> for something like asterisk IMO.
>
sorry for the ignorance what is "asterisk IMO"?
64 bits are usefull for trasncoding?
thanks
David

>
> So use what you're most familiar with.
>
> Gordon
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



-- 
(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090222/1b049d79/attachment.htm 


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list