[asterisk-users] What changed in Directed PickUp between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 ?

Olle E. Johansson oej at edvina.net
Mon Dec 21 06:19:01 CST 2009


21 dec 2009 kl. 09.34 skrev Olivier:

> 
> 
> 2009/12/21 Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net>
> 
> 21 dec 2009 kl. 00.04 skrev Olivier:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm banging my head over this.
> >
> > Usually, I'm using a SIP hardphone feature called "Call Pickup Starcode" to enhance BLF with Directed Call Pickup :
> > basically, SIP hardphone (here a Thomson ST2030S) is configured to send an INVITE message whenever a BLF is pressed while blinking.
> > The INVITE is build with the extension number (attached to the BLF that was blinking and pressed) prepended by a customizable Starcode sequence.
> >
> > For instance, when extension 142 is ringing (and *8 is the CallPickup Starcode), pressing the associated BLF would make the hardphone send an INVITE to extension *8142.
> >
> > With 1.6.1.11, this INVITE is treated as if "call picker" had dialed *8142 : it enters dialplan with appropriate extension and context.
> > With 1.6.2.0,  this INVITE fails with message like:
> > chan_sip.c:19814 handle_request_invite: Trying to pick up 462 at subs
> > The worst thing is that the INVITE message seems ignored and "Call Picker" phone keeps waiting for a reply from Asterisk.
> >
> >
> > Reading UPGRADE-1.6.txt didn't gave me any clue (as I suspected a change in call-limit, counteronpeer, ... variable in sip.conf).
> >
> > Is someone successfully using Directed Pickup with 1.6.2 ?
> >
> 
> The first paragraph under "SIP CHANGES" in CHANGES reads:
> " * Added support for SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY with dialog-info based call pickups.
>   Snom phones use this for call pickup of extensions that the phone is
>   subscribed to.
> "
> 
> I bet it's this code that messes with you. I am not aware of the details of the implementation, so I can't say if there's a way to turn it off.
> 
> Hi Olle,
> 
> Yes, I've read this paragraph before posting and to be honest, I couldn't see any obvious relation with my issue as in my case, BLF are not fully broken : BLF are blinking, on and off as usual, and pressing a blinking BLF generates an INVITE.
> 
> The only change I saw, is that with 1.6.1, when Asterisk receives a BLF-generated INVITE *8142, it enters appropriate context and extension and now, with 1.6.2, it doesn't though it still accept hand-typed *8142 sequence.
> 
> I'll dig deeper as obviously, there must be a difference somewhere between both INVITEs (the one when typing a *8142 sequence and the one generated when pressing a blinking BLF).

The difference is in the NOTIFY where you will get identification for the INVITE. Because of that, I guess that the INVITE for the call pickup has a Replaces: header. That will change the logic quite a lot.

/O


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list