[asterisk-users] srv records not being honoured properly

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 10:32 -0500, Andres wrote:
> 
> Because Asterisk does not support that.

Which is just another way of saying Asterisk is broken then.  SRV
records have requirements for their correct use.  If those requirements
are ignored, that is a broken implementation.

> The only thing that Asterisk 
> does is use the first SRV entry

First in terms of what was returned, not sorted by priority and weight,
right?

> but it pays no attention to priorities 
> or weights.  It does not care about other SRV entries either.

Tsk tsk tsk.

> This is 
> how things have been as long as I can remember.

Wonderful.  Nothing like half implementing standards.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081017/d6bd4161/attachment.pgp