[asterisk-users] Large Asterisk installations (~10, 000 extensions), preferably at universities

[Grygoriy Dobrovolskyy]

It is very simple take openser(opensips/openser/kamalio) the openser
community is great, the project have been here and tested for a years in
production, used by the biggest companyes (millions!) of users, it's a
carrier grade soft ;) in combination of cdrtool + opensips + mediaproxy you
can get 100% billing accuracy.

2008/11/28 Yehavi Bourvine <yehavi.bourvine at gmail.com>

> I did a test yesterday and did 1,000 registrations to Asterisk using SIPP.
> I did the register test since I am using the realtime DB and asterisk does
> periodic quesries to it for each registered user. Although Asterisk
> continued to function as usuall, it was in a steady loop querying the DB for
> the 1,000 users.
>
> OK, you convinced me to look at some front end to it. There are mainly
> three front ends mentioed here: OpenSer, SipExpress and FreeSwitch. Is there
> some comparison available which will save me from testing all three of them?
> Is there one which is more used than the others? (so it has more public QA
> :-)
>
>                          Thanks! __Yehavi:
>
> 2008/11/24 Steve Totaro <stotaro at totarotechnologies.com>
>
>> Fronting with OpenSER or FS, you should have no problems providing you
>> plan to use SIP extensions.
>>
>> What is critical are the max simultaneous trunks you are going to use.
>>
>> I would go TDM although universities have good bandwidth, and SUPERIOR
>> bandwidth between others.
>>
>> I would think a TDM DS3 or two just to be safe.  It should be pretty
>> trivial besides gotchas, like cat3 to the rooms, although channel
>> banks may be an even better solution if phones are already in place.
>>
>> Then you just use SIP when needed or wanted, and Asterisk is simple,
>> although more costly.
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Steve Totaro
>> +18887771888 (Toll Free)
>> +12409381212 (Cell)
>> +12024369784 (Skype)
>>
>>
>>  On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Wilton Helm <whelm at compuserve.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Yet another option is a commercial system with in-house staff.  I used
>> to
>> > maintain a NEC (NEAX 2400) for many years.  I went to factory training
>> and
>> > had total responsibility for it. Some manufacturers discourage or
>> prevent
>> > this, but others are open to it.  There are also 3rd party organizations
>> > (such as Source) that can supply parts and even expertise for those
>> going
>> > that direction.  Whether the result would be higher availability than
>> > Asterisk, I don't know.  Given I'm both a telco guy and a computer guru
>> (CS
>> > degree) I'd probably go the Asterisk route myself, because its open and
>> I
>> > would have more control.
>> >
>> > Wilton
>> >
>> >>and bug fixes than any commercial product sold in the intra-industrial
>> >> channel
>> >
>> > ... and they won't charge you a $30,000 license fee for the upgrade.
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20081128/97936c4c/attachment.htm