[asterisk-users] Why "should not run FastAGI on the same server" ?

[Olivier]

Thanks for replying : as it is written in voip-info.org, I really wondered
what original writer meant.

2008/5/27 Matt Florell <astmattf at gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> There is nothing wrong at all with running FastAGI on the same server
> as Asterisk. In fact a couple years ago, moving our call logging
> script from an AGI to a FastAGI in VICIDIAL reduced the load on the
> machine by over 50%. This might be an extremem example, but it
> illustrates the gains that can be made using FastAGI even on the same
> server.
>
> MATT---
>
> On 5/27/08, Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here
> > (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+FastAGI),
> > you can see :
> > "You will even see some improvement when converting your existing AGIs
> into
> > FastAGIs and running them on the same server as your phone system, though
> > this is not always feasible or recommended."
> >
> > Why "this is not always feasible or recommended" ?
> > Shall I understand "it's worth to try but if the burden is too heavy for
> a
> > single machine, be prepared to use two machines" ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> >  asterisk-users mailing list
> >  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080527/794f8474/attachment.htm