[asterisk-users] asterisk virtualization on VMWARESX infrastructure

[Senad Jordanovic]

Sam Tam wrote:
> Why if you have 50 operator then I would even consider using dual server
> running backup
> So the idea of using vmware may really be very risky, let alone not talk
> about performance issue

Sam

What experience do you have experience with a virtulisation with VoIP?



Senad
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Senad
> Jordanovic
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 3:37 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk virtualization on VMWARESX
> infrastructure
> 
> Michiel van Baak wrote:
>> On 14:42, Sat 17 May 08, Steve Totaro wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:18 PM, nik600 <nik600 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> what about asterisk virtualization on VMWARE XS infrastructure?
>>>>
>>>> The system installed will manage a call center with 50 operator,
>>>> queues, CDR logging on external database.
>>>>
>>>> the protocol used is SIP, probably with G711 codec.
>>>>
>>>> Virtualization of Asterisk i a risk regarding performance?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all
>>> I wouldn't do it.  Maybe in a lab but certainly not for a 50 seat call
> center.
>> I would ;)
>> We run asterisk under vmware in production and have no problem with it.
>> This is in a pure voip setup.
> 
> So do many of our customers handling many concurrent calls.
> 
> Senad
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>