[asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's

[C F]

On Jan 29, 2008 3:54 PM, Grey Man <greyvoip at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: C F <shmaltz at gmail.com>
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 January, 2008 8:05:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk's DANGEROUS Transfer CDR's
> >
> > Grey,
> > Just tested with 1.2.13
> > Asterisk always (blind or attd xfer) creates 2 records.
> > A few points, NEVER rely on source as the billable number.
> > Always use account codes.
> > Match the lastdata field against dst fields to figure out that it was
> > an xfer when doing the rating. The lastdata field will have the right
> > number.
> >
>
>
> That will work for blind transfers but not attended and even in the blind transfer case the CDR's still aren't correct you're relying on an informational field.
>

I tested it. It does so for both attended and blind. However, I only
tested it with SIP xfers and not with Tt.

>
>
>
>       Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>