[asterisk-users] asterisk optimalization

[Daniel Guthrie]

That's funny. I seem to remember installed Deb/* on a Poweredge 2950.

 

.must be slowly losing my mind. Another side effect of using Asterisk?
Dementia?

 

From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Gopal krishnan
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:51 AM
To: goksie at gmail.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk optimalization

 

Hi,

  Dell is not a recomeded server for linux. Its only compatible with
windows.

On Jan 24, 2008 12:02 PM, Goke Aruna <goksie at gmail.com> wrote: 

ram wrote:
> http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm
>
> check this link may help you
>
> ram
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 10:23 PM, marek cervenka < cervajs at fpf.slu.cz
<mailto:cervajs at fpf.slu.cz> 

> <mailto:cervajs at fpf.slu.cz>> wrote:
>
>     hi,
>
>     i'm testing asterisk 1.4/1.2 in the following scenario 
>     centos5/cpu quad xeon E5335 2.0Ghz
>     - test clients behind nat
>     - 1500+ testing instances - reregister option from 1min to 1hour
>     - qualify set to 5000
>
>     top shows over 100% cpu. cpu cores sometimes go to 95% 
>     with htop i see ~16threads but only one child have ~95% cpu
>     (how i can get info about that thread? what he is doing?)
>
>     what is major bottleneck? qualify imho not. i'm tried set 
>     qualify=no, does not help
>     SIP REGISTER packets?
>
>     this problem persist if no calls are active
>     after restart cpu usage slowly increase. after a ~hour is about 100%
>
>     which optimalizations do you recommend for ~1500 peers scenario?
(behind
>     nat, reregistrations)
>
>     ---------------------------------------
>     Marek Cervenka
>     ======================================= 
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
>     < http://www.api-digital.com/> --
>
>     asterisk-users mailing list
>     To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>       http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>     <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> 
>
>
>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> _______________________________________________
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>     <http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users>
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm 

That result is suprising! but i have DELL 2950 with 2 X 3.0GHz CPU on
6GB ram, equiped with 8e1 link (2 sangoma A104D)  running FC5. I
installed chan_ss7-1.0 with asterisk-1.2.25 doing transcoding, and each 
time calls get to 120+ the cpu is fully utilized.

the calls come from sip to the ss7 link.

can someone advice me on what I can do to improve the performance.


goksie
NB. I felt we re talking on the same topic thats why i added my own 
experience.


_______________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
<http://www.api-digital.com> --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
<http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users> 




-- 
Thank you  with regards,
Gopal,
PeopleTech Systems Private Limited
www.peopletech.co.in 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20080124/ed63939e/attachment-0001.htm