<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>That’s funny… I seem to remember installed Deb/* on a Poweredge
2950…<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>…must be slowly losing my mind. Another side effect of using
Asterisk? Dementia?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Gopal
krishnan<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:51 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> goksie@gmail.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk optimalization<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Hi,<br>
<br>
Dell is not a recomeded server for linux. Its only compatible with
windows.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>On Jan 24, 2008 12:02 PM, Goke Aruna <<a
href="mailto:goksie@gmail.com">goksie@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>ram wrote:<br>
> <a
href="http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm"
target="_blank">http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm</a><br>
><br>
> check this link may help you<br>
><br>
> ram<br>
><br>
> On Jan 23, 2008 10:23 PM, marek cervenka <<a
href="mailto:cervajs@fpf.slu.cz"> cervajs@fpf.slu.cz</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cervajs@fpf.slu.cz">cervajs@fpf.slu.cz</a>>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> hi,<br>
><br>
> i'm testing asterisk 1.4/1.2 in the following scenario <br>
> centos5/cpu quad xeon E5335 2.0Ghz<br>
> - test clients behind nat<br>
> - 1500+ testing instances - reregister option from 1min to
1hour<br>
> - qualify set to 5000<br>
><br>
> top shows over 100% cpu. cpu cores sometimes go to 95% <br>
> with htop i see ~16threads but only one child have ~95% cpu<br>
> (how i can get info about that thread? what he is doing?)<br>
><br>
> what is major bottleneck? qualify imho not. i'm tried set <br>
> qualify=no, does not help<br>
> SIP REGISTER packets?<br>
><br>
> this problem persist if no calls are active<br>
> after restart cpu usage slowly increase. after a ~hour is
about 100%<br>
><br>
> which optimalizations do you recommend for ~1500 peers
scenario? (behind<br>
> nat, reregistrations)<br>
><br>
> ---------------------------------------<br>
> Marek Cervenka<br>
> ======================================= <br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a
href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a><br>
> < <a href="http://www.api-digital.com/" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com/</a>>
--<br>
><br>
> asterisk-users mailing list<br>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
> <a
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
> <<a
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a>>
<br>
><br>
><br>
><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a
href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a>
--<br>
><br>
> asterisk-users mailing list<br>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
> <a
href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><a
href="http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm"
target="_blank">http://www.transnexus.com/White%20Papers/asterisk_V1-4-11_performance.htm
</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal>That result is suprising! but i have DELL 2950 with 2 X
3.0GHz CPU on<br>
6GB ram, equiped with 8e1 link (2 sangoma A104D) running FC5. I<br>
installed chan_ss7-1.0 with asterisk-1.2.25 doing transcoding, and each <br>
time calls get to 120+ the cpu is fully utilized.<br>
<br>
the calls come from sip to the ss7 link.<br>
<br>
can someone advice me on what I can do to improve the performance.<br>
<br>
<br>
goksie<br>
NB. I felt we re talking on the same topic thats why i added my own <br>
experience.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com"
target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com </a>--<br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users"
target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users </a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><br>
<br clear=all>
<br>
-- <br>
Thank you with regards,<br>
Gopal,<br>
PeopleTech Systems Private Limited<br>
<a href="http://www.peopletech.co.in">www.peopletech.co.in</a> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>