[asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)

[Julian Lyndon-Smith]

Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
> Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
> 

heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.

I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !

I know this is probably going to ignite the flames again ..

I have looked at the recent threads regarding these two manufacturers, 
but there didn't seem to be much *technical* differences between the 2, 
it was rather more subjective - some people say Sangoma is better, some 
say Digium. And quite a lot of "you're spreading FUD" "No, you are" etc.

I wanted to know if anyone has any specific comparisons or suggestions 
on the Sangoma A104D and the Digium TE406/411 cards ?

We have used the TE405 and te410 in the past, changed to sangoma A102 
(because of problems we were having at the time that we now think may 
have been telco related).

Setting up the digium cards seemed simpler (no patching etc, and no 
extra wanrouter drivers) but the A102 seem very stable and reliable.

Julian

> Julian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> 
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email for dotr.com has been scanned by MessageLabs
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
>