[asterisk-users] sangoma zaptel patches
stotaro at first-notification.com
Tue Nov 13 12:07:21 CST 2007
Dovid B wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tilghman Lesher" <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com>
> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
> <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 8:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] sangoma zaptel patches
>> On Sunday 11 November 2007 11:07:04 Steve Totaro wrote:
>>> Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>>> Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some
>>>> technical reservations with that patch. It seems that under certain
>>>> circumstances it may cause unexpected behavior when used with other
>>>> Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't understand why a safer method is
>>>> not used.
>>> Just out of curiosity, I have yet to see any issues with Sangoma cards
>>> and the way they ride on top (and patch) the Zaptel drivers. This
>>> personal dataset is around one hundred productions boxes.
>> How many of those boxes are of the type that Tzafrir is worried about?
>> Specifically, how many of those boxes contain a combination of telephony
>> hardware from vendors other than Sangoma?
> I have a box that now has a TDM400P. I will be installing a sangoma card in
> it soon and I actually need support for this.
I set up almost the exact same configuration and all went well (HP
DL380). No gotchas or glitches.
I have a feeling that Tzafrir is trying to fix what is not broken, since
he never pointed out a single conflict between various hardware using
patched Zaptel drivers configurations.
Maybe he is looking down the road and being proactive which I applaud,
but I think he is obsessing over what he feels is the "incorrect" way of
doing things and demanding (tone in emails) that they cooperate and do
what he tells them. A little tact goes a long way.
More information about the asterisk-users