[asterisk-users] RE: In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two H323 channels?

[Pavel Jezek]

for 1.4 you have only two choices chan_h323 and chan_ooh323,
chan_oh323 from inaccessible networks, is death project, more than year 
unmaintained,
I'm using chan_h323 both from 1.2 and 1.4 without problems (opposite 
site to chan_h323 is ci$co gateway or callmanager)
also, chan_ooh323 isn't maintained as good as chan_h323,
if you will have some issues with chan_h323, you can report through 
digium bugtrack and reply come quite quickly, not so with chan_ooh323
thats my reasons, why I can recommend original chan_h323.
PJ





Thiago Maluf wrote:
> Hi Users, Administrators and Pavel Jezek,
> You prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree and it's of course that use 
> channels by tree is very good.
> But in 1.2.x, the chan_h323 is very simple and the chan_oh323 is so bad.
> And I work with chan_ooh323, that it's too from Digium and work good!
> And I am Studing one possible change to Asterisk 1.4.x , but in 1.4.x 
> the oh323 channel don't have more, and studing the chan_h323, it's the 
> old chan_oh323
> I not wanna work with add_ons but in Asterisk 1.4.x, will I have work?
> Somebody confirm it, have the same opinion. Or this new chan_h323 work 
> fine without the problems that had the H323 or OH323 channels.
> Thanks in Advanced.
> Thiago Maluf Resende.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:57:42 +0100
> From: Pavel Jezek < pavel.jezek at i.cz <mailto:pavel.jezek at i.cz>>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users]   In Asterisk 1.4.x, Why Digium has two
>        H323    Channels
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
>        < asterisk-users at lists.digium.com 
> <mailto:asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>>
> Message-ID: <45F56A66.9020800 at i.cz <mailto:45F56A66.9020800 at i.cz>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> as I know, ooh323 is external project from objective systems,
> anyway, for 1.4 I prefer chan_h323 from asterisk tree.
>
>
>
> Thiago Maluf wrote:
> > Now, the H323 Channels is updated and your bugs fixed.
> > But Digium still develop your OOH323 Channel. My question is why?
> > What is the better in Asterisk 1.4.x.? I know that in Asterisk 1.2.x
> > OOH323 is very better than H323 or OH323.
> > Thanks in advanced.
> > Thiago.
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------------
> ----------------------------------
> > THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
> > Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
> > Tel: +55 21 86042100
> > e-mail: malufrj at gmail.com <mailto:malufrj at gmail.com> <mailto: 
> malufrj at gmail.com <mailto:malufrj at gmail.com>>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com 
> <http://easynews.com/> --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >     http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> THIAGO MALUF RESENDE
> Consultor Voip e Programador WEB (Voip Developer and Web Developer)
> Tel: +55 21 86042100
> e-mail: malufrj at gmail.com <mailto:malufrj at gmail.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>