[asterisk-users] chan_features.so / asterisk 1.4.5

[Jack]

Joshua Colp schrieb:
> Jack wrote:
>   
>> Thanks for your answer and sorry for my late response.
>>
>> So what does this exactly mean to me? Can I keep chan_features.so from 
>> 1.4.4? What consequences does it have when chan_features.so is disabled 
>> und why has this been done? Is chan_features.so related to features.conf?
>>
>>     
>
> chan_features.so doesn't provide anything useful, it's not used anywhere 
> because it's not really finished. As for why it was changed to be 
> disabled by default oej probably thought that since we aren't using it 
> why do we have it enabled by default.
>
> It's fine to live in a world without chan_features.so :)
>
>   
Thank you very much.