[asterisk-users] PRI cards, Digium vs. Sangoma

[shadowym]

They know what they are doing and do a lot of it.  I don't have to give an
opinion myself.  There is enough evidence all over for people to draw the
proper conclusions for themselves.

-----Original Message-----
From: C F [mailto:shmaltz at gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 4:39 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI cards, Digium vs. Sangoma

On 8/26/07, shadowym <shadowym at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Well there are a couple fine examples of FUD if I do say so myself.  Just
do
> a search and see what cards the 'serious' companies out there are using.
> Nuff said.

Can you define 'serious'?


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Lytle [mailto:support at drdos.info]
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 8:49 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] PRI cards, Digium vs. Sangoma
>
> Eric "ManxPower" Wieling wrote:
> > Sangoma cards are complicated to set up, have a history of kernel (and
> > zaptel) VERSION issues.  i.e. It seems like the zaptel or kernel version
> > I'm running on a machine is always something newer than is supported by
> > the Sangoma drivers.  Never had any issues once I got it compiled.
> >
>
> You're forgetting one.
>
> I'm terrified of upgrading zaptel or the kernel from remote with the
> systems I have Sangoma cards on.  I have, on many occasions, had kernel
> panics when trying to shut down wanrouter.  I don't have this 'fear'
> with Digium cards.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>