[asterisk-users] Sort of OT: PBX vs CO
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Fri Aug 10 13:33:18 CDT 2007
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 02:04:45PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Asterisk is _NOT_ a switch. Asterisk is not a transit element.
> Asterisk is an *endpoint*. It makes for a nice PBX, feature server, etc.
> Kind of like the BroadSoft, but on a much smaller scale.
>
> > I hadn't been tracking oSS7 lately; didn't realize that.
>
> As far as I can tell, it's still pretty useless. There are a variety of
> commercial/proprietary SS7 solutions available, though, but I haven't
> tinkered. And in any case they don't strike me as being able to interface
> with Asterisk.
Those two thoughts tie into one another. You can make a CO switch into
a PBX, but usually not the other way around.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list