[asterisk-users] Sort of OT: PBX vs CO

Jay R. Ashworth jra at baylink.com
Fri Aug 10 13:33:18 CDT 2007


On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 02:04:45PM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
>    Asterisk is _NOT_ a switch.  Asterisk is not a transit element. 
> Asterisk is an *endpoint*.  It makes for a nice PBX, feature server, etc.
> Kind of like the BroadSoft, but on a much smaller scale.
> 
> > I hadn't been tracking oSS7 lately; didn't realize that.
> 
>    As far as I can tell, it's still pretty useless.  There are a variety of 
> commercial/proprietary SS7 solutions available, though, but I haven't
> tinkered.  And in any case they don't strike me as being able to interface
> with Asterisk.

Those two thoughts tie into one another.  You can make a CO switch into
a PBX, but usually not the other way around.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                   Baylink                      jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com                     '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA      http://photo.imageinc.us             +1 727 647 1274



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list