[asterisk-users] Reliability of the newer IAXy's

[Lists]

Thanks for the reply. It was the type of info I was looking for. I was mostly interested because of the IAX protocol and being able to more easily traverse NAT situations. But for the price, I tend to agree and why I have been hesitant at buying one.
 
Robert 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Andrew Joakimsen 
Sent: Fri, 9/15/2006 4:01pm
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Reliability of the newer IAXy's 
 
 
Honestly for the price its a bad unit. If they were priced $40-50 then
yes its a great unit. But at $90, single port, no web config, very
basic provisioning and with the S100 we had many issues of reliablity
where a SIP ATA did not have the same issues. Maybe it's heat, but
thats an issue I would expect from a $40 chinese ATA, not something
that cost over $100 at the time.

For $10 less you can find the SPA-2100 which has double the voice
ports, a built in router and more options.

On 9/15/06, Lists <Lists at ropeguru.com> wrote:
> Is anyone out there currently using the newest model IAXy? I was thinking about purchasing one for testing but was wondering if they have gotten any better than the original models.
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users