[asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
ronald at elmit.com
Mon Sep 4 06:22:09 MST 2006
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
> On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
>> try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than
>> why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the
>> first match count?
> Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit "OK". At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here...
What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking.
It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question,
than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't.
You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using
here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it?
If it is a sequence of "tones", than why is it different if it is in a
string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones?
If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on
the system to take a longer break between "tones" still as a string?
Back to the dialplan:
A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen
as a complete "picture", and so a three digit and a four digit number is
something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked
down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just
garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three
digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number !!!!
I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to 61522, however, 61522 does
not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should
proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe)
More information about the asterisk-users