[asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits

[Tim St. Pierre]

Are you using # to transfer?  If so, it's not sending it as a new call, it's 
just sending asterisk digits using whatever DTMF mode.  Asterisk parses these 
based on a "first match" in the dialplan.  Make sure that the longer 
extension numbers are loaded first in the dialplan.

-Tim

On September 2, 2006 20:12, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> Kevin Smith wrote:
> > Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things.
> > And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along
> > with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from
> > one to the other.
>
> I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I
> also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I
> hardly can post my entire configuration.
>
> > What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a
> > lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on.
>
> You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore.
> The messages fly by so fast, .... Especially annoying messages:
>  chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from
> '<sip:192.168.250.20>' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name
> mismatch
>  -- Got SIP response 486 "Busy Here" back from 192.168.250.244
>  -- Got SIP response 400 "Bad Request" back from xx.xx.xx.126
> NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to
> authenticate on REGISTER to '1747xxxxx at proxy01.sipphone.com' (Tries 3)
> .....
>
> It would be nice to "filter" the CLI for such investigation for a moment.
>
> > What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to
> > pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending
> > the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has
> > 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where
> > most of your problem is.
>
> That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these
> no-name phones.
>
> > My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the
> > information you provided.
>
> I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer
> different. That makes not really sense, does it?
>
> bye
>
> Ronald
>
> > Kevin
> >
> > Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> >> David Gagnon wrote:
> >>> Ronald,
> >>>
> >>>     You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give
> >>> you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy?
> >>>
> >>> David
> >>
> >> David,
> >>
> >> I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system
> >> !!!!!
> >>
> >> I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use
> >> blind transfer. Is the question too difficult?
> >>
> >> I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as
> >> for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number.
> >> It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses
> >> the ok key.
> >>
> >>> -----Message d'origine-----
> >>> De : asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> >>> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] De la part de Ronald
> >>> Wiplinger
> >>> Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20
> >>> À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> >>> Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
> >>>
> >>> Anthony Rodgers wrote:
> >>>> With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan......
> >>
> >> This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!)
> >>
> >>
> >> Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more
> >> messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS.
> >> Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the
> >> problem! Thanks for your understanding.
> >>
> >> bye
> >>
> >> Ronald - again, I am not angry at all.
> >>
> >>> WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan?????
> >>> I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last
> >>> digit!!!
> >>> Where can I set that it waits for it?
> >>>
> >>> The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and
> >>> overlapping, ....
> >>>
> >>> bye
> >>>
> >>> Ronald
> >>>
> >>>> CP
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote:
> >>>>> I found a problem in blind transfer:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 !!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since
> >>>>> snom
> >>>>> requires me to hit "ok"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the
> >>>>> busy
> >>>>> signal and I hang up as usually with transfer.
> >>>>> Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, ....
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What could be the problem ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> bye
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ronald
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Tim St. Pierre

IP telephony specialist
sip://5101@communicatefreely.net
Toronto: 647 722 6930
Toll-Free 1 888 488 6940
tim at communicatefreely.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060902/537d74cb/attachment.pgp