[asterisk-users] overlap of zap trunk groups

[Eric "ManxPower" Wieling]

Damon Estep wrote:
> Can anyone suggest any reasons why a zap (PRI) b channel should not be a
> member of multiple zap trunk group definitions?
> 
>  
> 
> For example;
> 
>  
> 
> Group 1 = Channels 1 to 23
> 
> Group 2 = channels 1 to 12
> 
> Group 3 = channels 13 to 23
> 
>  
> 
> The purpose is to restrict the number of channels a particular
> extensions can use, but use the entire span for other extensions.

Part of a production /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf:

group=1
channel => 1-6
group=1,2
channel => 7-12
group=0
channel => 13-16