[asterisk-users] overlap of zap trunk groups

[Damon Estep]

Can anyone suggest any reasons why a zap (PRI) b channel should not be a
member of multiple zap trunk group definitions?

 

For example;

 

Group 1 = Channels 1 to 23

Group 2 = channels 1 to 12

Group 3 = channels 13 to 23

 

The purpose is to restrict the number of channels a particular
extensions can use, but use the entire span for other extensions.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061031/6cd5430c/attachment.htm