[asterisk-users] Callmanager 3.3(5) and Asterisk with ooh323

Ward, Bill bill.ward at cyberdefenses.com
Wed Oct 25 01:24:12 MST 2006


I started from scratch again. This time i went with oh323 instead of ooh323.  I still get the same issue but this time it says call refused by remote host.  It doesn't explain why though.  I can't understand the CCM trace logs to see why it might be refusing the connection.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Ward, Bill
Sent: Tue 10/24/2006 10:57 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Callmanager 3.3(5) and Asterisk with ooh323
 

I have tried GSL and ulaw.  tried one at a time.  tried both and even tried g729 and g7231.  still same issue.  Unless i am thinking of something different


-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com on behalf of Michael Araba
Sent: Tue 10/24/2006 10:36 PM
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Callmanager 3.3(5) and Asterisk with ooh323
 
I have experience problems like this in a different scenario. It is
usually due to codec translation problem.

What is the default codec set on CCM for the IP Phone and the default
set in Asterisk? Make sure the defaults are the same. Try G.711

Michael

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3613 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061025/717e1eec/attachment.bin


More information about the asterisk-users mailing list