[Asterisk-Users] rxfax problem
Andrew Joakimsen
joakimsen at gmail.com
Tue Oct 24 15:24:25 MST 2006
But if we have asterisk and add on Steve's code wouldn't it (suppor to
recieve a t.38 fax call and have spandsp decode it) work? What does Steve
granting a license to Digium have to do with it? I don't care if Asterisk
and the fax support don't come from the same place.
On 10/23/06, Lee Howard <faxguy at howardsilvan.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
>
> > On 10/23/06, *Steve Underwood* <steveu at coppice.org
> > <mailto:steveu at coppice.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The latest test versions of the spandsp support both ECM and T.38.
> The
> > T.38 functionality may not be available with Asterisk, though.
> >
> >
> > Is there any other software it would work with?
>
>
> Yes, OpenPBX.
>
> > Is there any situation under which it might work?
>
>
> I don't really know how to respond to the ambiguity in that question.
>
> > If you don't mind saying, what is missing for full t.38 support?
>
>
> Steve giving Digium a royalty-free license to his GPL software or a
> pure-GPL branch of the Asterisk codebase, take your pick.
>
> > Also with ECM being present now, that should eliminate distortion?
>
>
> ECM remedies data corruption and not image distortion caused by a broken
> viewer.
>
> > Its at random places during the fax there are "glitches" such as parts
> > of the line missing or being shifted a bit
>
>
> Yes, ECM probably will address that.
>
> Lee.
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061024/58c0aa8f/attachment.htm
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list