[asterisk-users] Centos kernel 34 vs. 42?

[Michiel van Baak]

On Oct 13, 2006, at 7:58 PM, Remco Barendse wrote:

> Hi list!
>
> I read the trixbox anouncement that they downgraded to kernel  
> version 34
> to get rid of some audio problems
>
> I'm not running trixbox but normal Centos 4 with asterisk installed. I
> tried to find some further info on this but couldn't find any.
>
> Do audio problems occur with normal Centos and the latest kernel  
> version
> too? (In other words, should every centos user downgrade??)
>
> I'm now running kernel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL

Not really an answer to your question, but I found out all kernels  
above 2.6.16 do a better job on asterisk systems then the ones before  
that. No idea how this is possible as I'm in no way familiar with the  
inner workings of the linux kernel, but I found out after upgrading  
one system and because it was better there I upgraded a lot of other  
boxes and they all became better. Maybe you can get a newer kernel on  
centos then the 2.6.9

---
Michiel van Baak
michiel at vanbaak.eu
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71C946BD

"Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called  
users?"



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20061013/a4f200a4/PGP.pgp