[asterisk-users] priority problem

[Filip Drągowski]

Did You try CLI> show dialplan ?
if You set up 911 extension in 2 diffrent context and both context are 
included
in third .. only one 911 will be available. 911 first loaded to asterisk 
dialplan
will be valid and second will be discarded.
Loading dialplan (example below)
[mycontext] should load [context1] first, 911 aplly
then [context2] is loaded .. trying to apply second 911..
but ther is one alredy !
mayby that is a problem ?
> Actually, for the exten 911, it flows through "do stuff", then "do
> stuff3" instead of "do stuff2".  I want to implement it because I can
> maintenance the dial plan easily.
>
> Say,
> My default context is [mycontext], and your default context is
> [yrcontext].  We have some common contexts but not all.  So I can
> simple remark some include statement of it is not necessary.  As I
> expect, I can go thro' "do stuff, 2 & 3 stuff" and you can go thro' "2
> & 3 stuff". But I am wrong in the design.  Someone here suggest to use
> macro to implement my design.  As I want to use ARA in my design.  If
> I use macro to here, ARA will be meaningless.
>
> [mycontext]
> include => context1
> include => context2
> include => context3
>
> [yrcontext]
> include => context2
> include => context3
>
> [context1]
> exten => 911,1,do stuff here
>
> [context2]
> exten => *31,1, enable cfwd
> exten => *32,1, disable cfwd
> exten => 911,1, do stuff2 here
> exten => 911,2, do stuff3 here
>
>