[asterisk-users] NuFone, please send the log file

[C F]

While I don't disagree with you, look at what my point was, just
accusing them for such without any documentation doesn't make sens.

On 7/11/06, trixter aka Bret McDanel <trixter at 0xdecafbad.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 20:16 -0400, C F wrote:
> > I find this hard to believe, half a truth is a whole lie. First you
> > just say the screwed you out $3k, not saying how, letting everyone
> > assume thru phone service, then you change the story, you lied before,
> > how do we know you are saying the truth now?
>
> Elaborating on a story isnt changing it, its providing additional
> details.  That is hardly a lie.  The fact that he claims he lost $3000
> from nufone did not in anyway change, the fact that you assumed
> something then found out that you were wrong in your assumption does not
> make him a liar either.
>
> But you get an A for effort.
>
> > In any case it doesnt make sense anyhow, why would you pay $3k for
> > just setting up a server, when others here on the list will do it for
> > much less. Also they never did the work? just took the money? thats an
> > accusation that doesn't make sense.
>
> Just becuase others will do it for less doesnt mean that he didnt opt
> for them to do the work.  I dont see that as not making sense, there are
> many lawyers out there that charge a premium for their services when you
> can get one much cheaper.  Yet the expensive ones still get clients.
> The same is true for virtually every industry and even products.  People
> will buy name brand foods instead of the white label generics even
> though they might be the same.  People buy brand name drugs instead of
> the generics (which are identical in chemical composition) yet the
> generics are cheaper.  It happens every day in virtually every good and
> service.
>
> As for someone taking  the money and not doing the work, that happens
> all too often as well.  As such a claim that it doesnt make sense that
> someone wanted something for nothing isnt so easily dismissed.
>
> NuFone placed a ton of international calls on behalf of a customer, then
> later they tried to not pay for the service that was provided according
> to their contract.  Why?  Because the calls were to a destination that
> had a high billing rate and NuFone didnt charge enough for the call.
> They signed the contract to pay for those services, they billed the
> customer for those calls, yet they didnt want to make good on it (jermey
> was all too eager to talk about this to forbes and other major
> publications too, so its Jermeys claim that they didnt want to pay for
> service provided).  As such the "something for nothing" issue is
> something NuFone has an admitted history of.
>
> That tends to lend credibility to the claim that they did indeed do
> this, although it doesnt prove it, and the 'doesnt make sense' argument
> is no better than 'chewbacca'.
>
> Again you get an A for effort.
>
>
> --
> Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
> Belfast IE +44 28 9099 6461    DE +49 801 777 555 3402
> Utrecht NL +31 306 553058      US WA +1 360 207 0479
> US NY +1 516 687 5200          FreeWorldDialup: 635378
> http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBEtEcx+1olxlzQw5cRAvz3AKCOXgz+Zn+EiAYr3Pn3WW3UMZLM9gCeM2Ni
> eEkyrr7IV3+ESR0JG0sJsIU=
> =xgdk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>