[asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards

C F shmaltz at gmail.com
Mon Jul 10 11:46:10 MST 2006


But my question is, those that mean that it will take 1 second to
convert 50 channels? if so do I get a 1 second latency when coverting
50 channels?

On 7/10/06, Fabio <folist at trestech.com.ar> wrote:
> I think it's the same,
>         10 calls in 200ms = 50 calls in 1s
> because 1s = 5 x 200ms
>
> IMHO, is better to use seconds as period, because is more ease to compare
> rate speeds of each codec that are in bits per second.
>
> fabio
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com]En nombre de C F
> Enviado el: Domingo, 09 de Julio de 2006 06:57 p.m.
> Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] intel vs amd motherboards
>
>
> Thanks for that Tzafrir. Why does it ignore the secend CPU?
>
> BTW, on a side note on this topic, how can one calculate simultaneous
> transcoded channels using show transalation?
>
> In the case where it tells me 17 ms for encoding and 4 for decoding,
> that gives me 21ms per channel, in what time frame can I squeeze in
> how many channels before the calls start becoming  intolerable? In
> other words should I aim for a 200ms time frame which means that I
> will get around 10 channels? or can I aim for a full second? which
> will give me around 50 channels?
>
> Thank You
>
> On 7/9/06, Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:07:16AM -0400, C F wrote:
> > > Tzafrir, are you trying to tell me that I can realy do double on the
> > > intel becuase the second CPU will do it?
> >
> > In the ideal case you'll get double performance with two CPUs. In
> > theory.
> >
> > A case of many concurrent calls is basically something that can be
> > easily parallelized. So in theory nothing stops you from getting
> > something closer to double performance. I don't know how close reality
> > is to that nice theory.
> >
> > I only remarked that 'show translations' totally ignores the second CPU.
> >
> > --
> > Tzafrir Cohen      sip:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
> > icq#16849755       iax:tzafrir at local.xorcom.com
> > +972-50-7952406
> > tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com  http://www.xorcom.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list