[Asterisk-Users] Build Error - ZT_EVENT_DTMFDIGIT
hugolivude
hugolivude at gmail.com
Thu Jan 12 08:15:00 MST 2006
Thanks Kevin; exactly what I was looking for. I was using:
cvs checkout -r v1-0_stable asterisk
because that's what it said to do on the cardboard card that was
packed with my TDM400. I wondered about the mixing and matching of
HEAD and STABLE when I was writing the email, but that's all I could
see to do when I was following the instructions given.
I checked out the wiki. Just to confirm, if I issue the command:
# svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk asterisk
I'd get the most recent _working_ version of Asterisk. But if I issue
the command:
# svn checkout http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.2 asterisk-1.2
I'd get the most recent _stable_ version of Asterisk.
I'd be most grateful if you could confirm this form me.
Many Thanks,
Hugh
On 1/12/06, Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at digium.com> wrote:
> hugolivude wrote:
>
> > When I went to get Asterisk I did the following:
> >
> > cvs checkout zaptel libpri
> > and
> > cvs checkout -r v1-0_stable asterisk
>
> This is wrong. You do _not_ want to try to use CVS HEAD Zaptel and
> libpri with CVS v1-0 asterisk. Also, if you pull the v1-0_stable tag
> from CVS, you'll be getting a very old version.
>
> Why don't you start over with some proper checkout instructions as
> documented on the wiki... and maybe try to use Subversion (because it's
> easier) and version 1.2 of everything (because version 1.0 is no longer
> being updated)... you'll end up with a better system :-)
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
More information about the asterisk-users
mailing list