[Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)

Brett, Gary gary.brett at cetelem.co.uk
Wed Jan 4 08:30:07 MST 2006


>From what ive read on this list and the wiki, centos 4.x has issues with the
TE110P card ( a lot of people having issues after first reboot).Would 3.5 be
better (I know *@home uses this) 

Am I right in saying that OS's with the 1.6 kernel still require a lot more
"tinkering" than those with the 1.4 kernel ?? Does anybody know what Digiums
stance on OS is , I remember speaking to them about 6 months ago and they
were recommending a 1.4 kernel version of Debian. 

Are there any specific disadvantages to running 1.4 kernel ??, 

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Robert La
Ferla
Sent: 04 January 2006 02:16
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?)

Michael Stearne wrote:
> I am having trouble with FC3.
>
> After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile
> 1.2.1 from source:
>
> make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast'
> make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast'
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime'
> make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> `/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/include/stddef.h', needed by
> `localtime.o'.  Stop.
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime'
> make: *** [stdtime/libtime.a] Error 2
>
> and when I try to update from binary:
>
> [root at red2 ~]# rpm -Uvh asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm
> warning: asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY,
> key ID 66534c2b
> error: Failed dependencies:
>         libpri.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386
>         libspandsp.so.0 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386
>         libtonezone.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386
>
> I have compiled from source 1.0.9 without problem on this machine.
>
> Any ideas why my attempts are now failing?
>
>   

To use the binary, it appears that you need libpri.  Look at 
http://www.asterisk.org (top right hand side)  Did you try getting the 
latest source via "svn" subversion?

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list