Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

[Asterisk]

>If the two servers service distinctly separate groups of endpoints,
they 
>can share the same table since they won't care about the other server's

>entries. If the two servers service the same endpoints but in an 
>active/passive arrangement, that would also work.

In my case I would be using DNS round robin.  So a UA would only be
registering to one * server at a time.  So wouldn't in fact be an
active/passive?  


If not could I call the Asterisk Manager Interface from my java fastAGI
to grab the sip channel status on each server?  I have not use the
Manager interface before so I don't know how fast it is, but does this
sound like it would work? 


To answer a previous poster. My issue for me is high availability and
scalability.    

Thanks

Doug




-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin P.
Fleming
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:13 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: Using *RT for HA purposes was: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime
MultipleAsterisk boxes, iaxusers

Mike Fedyk wrote:

> With the current *RT release?

Yes. The crux of the issue that you can't have two servers responsible 
for updating the same records in the table, and that you can't have two 
servers both expected to react to changes in those records on an 
instantaneous basis (which is why you can't share the table across two 
active servers and expect both of them to be aware of where the peers
are).

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users