[Asterisk-Users] Re: More Polycom IP501 questions

[Anton Krall]

What are people doing with the minibrowser? Any nice stuff been done out
there? 

|-----Original Message-----
|From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com 
|[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of 
|Andrew Kohlsmith
|Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:35 PM
|To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
|Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: More Polycom IP501 questions
|
|On Friday 10 February 2006 14:22, Noah Miller wrote:
|> We've never bothered with Shared line appearances.  I've pretty much 
|> assumed they are only good for emulating a key system.  For us it 
|> would be more of a hindrance than a feature, as only our 
|receptionists 
|> are ever interested in taking calls from the main line 
|(everyone else 
|> is DID).  We just use our multiple line appearances to allow 
|our users 
|> to take multiple calls.  Sort of an advanced, 
|visually-driven call-waiting.
|
|*nods* -- and based on what others are saying, Asterisk's SIP 
|stack does not really work with shared line appearances 
|anyway.  A classic case of me making things more complicated 
|than they need to be.  :-)
|
|> > I haven't even started to play with the mini browser; that looks 
|> > like it is going to have some serious potential, too.
|
|> Does the minibrowser work on the 500's?  I though it was only on the 
|> 600 series.
|
|Hmm... that explains why the one set of config files I have 
|has the "home" URL defined as 
|"http://dont.you.wish.you.had.an.ip601.hehe/".  
|
|Thanks for the input, everyone.  I need to digest this 
|information into a "Quick and Easy setup of a Polycom IP501" 
|for the wiki.
|
|-A.
|_______________________________________________
|--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
|
|Asterisk-Users mailing list
|To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
|