[Asterisk-Users] Problem with Wait() and chan_capi-cm?

Florian Heer heer at ueberdosis.de
Sat Feb 11 19:24:47 MST 2006


Hi!

I am playing around with Asterisk and have a problem :-)
(Asterisk-version: 1.2.4, chan_capi-cm-version: 0.6.4)
I have a sip-phone at my desk and an ISDN-phone (independent of the 
Asterisk-server) in my living room, when I'm not at my desk, the 
sip-phone is switched off. I would like to be able to accept calls at 
both phones (when available) and have Voicemail kick in if I don't 
answer. The 'normal' extension would be something like this:

exten => 12345,1,Dial(SIP/me,30)
exten => 12345,2,VoiceMail(su12345)

Works fine as long as the sip-phone is available, if it is not, it is 
flagged congested/busy, so the next extension would be 102, if I wanted 
VoiceMail to kick in in that case, this works:
exten => 12345,1,Dial(SIP/me,30)
exten => 12345,2,VoiceMail(su12345)
exten => 12345,102,VoiceMail(su12345)

But that is not, what I had in mind, I would like to have 30 seconds to 
get to the phone, so in theory, this should do the trick:
exten => 12345,1,Dial(SIP/me,30)
exten => 12345,2,VoiceMail(su12345)
exten => 12345,102,Wait(30)
exten => 12345,103,VoiceMail(su12345)

But Asterisk can not take over the line after the wait.

To test, if the Wait was the problem, I created this:
exten => 12345,1,Wait(10)
exten => 12345,2,Answer()
exten => 12345,3,Milliwatt()

And still: Asterisk can't take over the ISDN line. The console output says:
  == ISDN1: Incoming call '12345' -> '12345'
    -- Executing Wait("CAPI/ISDN1/12345-19", "10") in new stack
    -- Executing Answer("CAPI/ISDN1/12345-19", "") in new stack
  == ISDN1: Answering for 12345
    -- Executing Milliwatt("CAPI/ISDN1/12345-19", "") in new stack
       > CAPI INFO 0x34d1: Invalid call reference value
  == Spawn extension (capi-in, 12345, 3) exited non-zero on 
'CAPI/ISDN1/12345-19'
  == ISDN1: CAPI Hangingup

If I try that in a pure sip-context, it works as I thought it would.

Now: do I do something wrong? Is there a problem with the Wait() 
application? Or is that more likely a bug in chan_capi-cm?

Regards, Florian.



More information about the asterisk-users mailing list